Why Shouldn’t Sardar Patel Be Put Above Indira Gandhi?
You see the coefficient of the linear, is 
juxtaposition, by the hemoglobin of the atmospheric pressure in the 
country…
- Amitab Bachan (Amar, Akbar, Anthony) 
No, I am not turning into a Bollywood movie 
critic. Looking at the recent confused mindset of the Congress leaders 
after prolonged losses in various elections the entire leadership might 
as well have uttered the above line on the issue
of how the present government gave a royal snub to Indira Gandhi on her 
death anniversary and still would have made as much sense as their 
entire jamboree out of frustration did.
True to their quality of remaining perpetual 
sycophants for the Nehru-Gandhi clan, the Congress leadership fell over 
each other in criticizing BJP on their decision to sidekick Indira 
Gandhi from the scheme of things and gone ahead to celebrate
October 31st as the birth anniversary of Sardar Ballabh Bhai 
Patel as ‘National Unity Day’ henceforth. Now two question needs to be 
answered right here. First – Is Sardar not a legitimate candidate for 
his birthday to be celebrated in grand scale
manner? Second – Has Indira Gandhi done anything credible for the nation
 that we should even celebrate her death anniversary as if there is no 
tomorrow? And this post in particular will revolve around these two 
questions to figure out if Modi government is
fair in their decision to the tune that the NDA office bearers think it 
to be. 
First let’s move to Indira Gandhi and her 
contributions or the lack of it towards the nation. Why IG to start 
with? Because till date the government of India, irrespective of which 
party is in power used to celebrate October 31st
as the death anniversary of Indira Gandhi. It won’t be an exaggeration 
if I say most of this Facebook and MTV Roadies generation may not even 
be aware that Sardar Patel was born on the same day. So IG and her 
importance over the iron man must have solid reasons
to justify why the preceding governments so conveniently forgot the 
first home minister of India.
So there we go. Whenever someone reminds me of IG 
the first and the last thing that crosses my mind is the emergency and a
 rogue called Sanjay Gandhi, who unfortunately was the son of this lady.
 Now show me one single country where the
birth and death anniversary of a leader who probably could be 
instrumental (better be, primary reason) for the enormous number of poor
 and illiterate in the country gets his/her birthday celebrated like a 
mega national event. There would be countries where
dictators celebrate their rogue ancestors but we are a democracy and 
that too largest among the world. Even the reason behind imposing 
emergency is more criminal than the emergency itself. The lady did it 
not because the circumstances demanded for it but because
her own ego was getting sabotaged for genuine reasons. The Allahabad 
high court rightly revoked her Loksabha win because she was found to 
have misused state machinery for electoral gain. Seeing her power going 
out of her hands she promptly announced emergency
there by curbing the powers of the state, its judiciary and everything 
in between. Many nationalistic leaders were arrested and put behind bars
 because they were agitating against such naked massacre of our 
democratic frameworks. Not only that, the lady let
loose his retard son on the entire populace to run mayhem. Sanjay Gandhi
 along with his stooges literally looted the nation in broad daylight. 
Unaccounted loans of large sums were disbursed to the near and dear ones
 of SG without zero or minimal paperwork.
A rough estimate of the loots in disguise of bank loans from all state 
run banks stands at a staggering 783 crores. 783 crores during seventies
 and you can easily calculate the amount in contemporary times. Not only
 loot but all democratic institutions were
manhandled and turned to ashes in just about 18 months. Not a single 
institution was left from the dirty doings of the mother-son duo. Lest 
we forget the number of innocents, those were murdered so that the loot 
can go on unopposed. It would be optimism if
I say the country was dragged at least 20 years back because of this 
emergency.
This is not only one instance where the lady messed
 up the nation for her own ego and personal gain. Bhindranwale is 
another dark spot in Indian history, as was the emergency. Her father 
made a mess with Kashmir and standing true to the
legacy of her father she messed up Punjab. I don’t know if it is 
hereditary but messing up in matters that are nationalistic seems to be 
running in the grand family of Congress. Thankfully the Punjab clutter 
got cleared up in about a decade and half else we
are pretty much cleaning up the rot that Nehru piled in Kashmir since 
last six decades and still we are far from cleaning it all. Just because
 the Bhindranwale was hurting the one-upmanship of IG, the lady did 
something that looked strategically so out of
tune. But till date I wonder – had that been a mosque instead of golden 
temple and the terrorists hidden inside were Muslims instead of Sikhs, 
would have IG dared to order our army to rush in? Well my guess is as 
good as yours. From this point it would be
utterly unfair on my part if I don’t revisit the times when the Muslim 
appeasement started to become a state policy. Though Nehru installed the
 foundation stones for appeasement he was more of a socialist centric 
than otherwise. In true sense it is Indira
who commissioned this rotten culture of appeasement into our political 
discourse.
Can such a lady be even compared with the 
magnanimity of a legend like Sardar, let alone putting her above? Even 
the Bharat Ratna she won has a dark secret hidden behind it. As per our 
cultural ministry’s own words, a Bharat Ratna for an
individual can only be suggested by the priminister of the nation. And 
when Indira won it in 1971, it was she who was the PM herself. Does this
 mean she awarded Bharat Ratna to herself only? Won’t be surprised if 
that was the case since she only seem to be
following her great clueless father’s legacy. Ditto like her father, who
 awarded Bharat Ratna to himself while still being the PM of the nation 
in 1955 Indira repeated the shamelessness quite nonchalantly. But come 
to Sardar Patel, the Congress party had to
wait 41 years post Sardar’s death to realize how big a character the man
 was. And, this is not all. When eventually Sardar was found to be 
competent enough for the award of Bharat Ratna, it was not a Chinese 
Gandhi that was at the helm but Narasimha Rao. If
you think that is all then wait. Sardar was awarded the honor along with
 Rajiv Gandhi who so called achieved martyrdom (according to Congress 
dictionary) just couple of years back.
I would be fair with my assessment if I say; 
Congress party by design ignored a persona like Sardar Patel so that the
 image of all the Chinese Gandhis of the family is not over shadowed by 
true nationalists. Ditto is the case with Lalbahadur
Shatri and to some extent even Narasimha Rao. And that is precisely what
 Narendra Modi is trying to point out. When Congress accuses Modi of 
hijacking the idea of Sardar Patel it only calls for laugh riots. Before
 we move ahead, I want to ask every sycophant
in Congress – when Congress ever cared for anyone else except the 
Gandhi-Nehru family? It was and is the Gandhi family all the way. The 
jokers were so oblivious to their real greats that there arises no 
question of anyone hijacking any great personality from
them. It is only when Modi took out Sardar from that designed oblivion 
and brought him into public memory and bestowed the due respect that 
Sardar demands, the Congress reptiles woke from their planned slumber 
and started shouting. Where were the same faggots
when they conveniently named 51 state run schemes after Gandhi family 
against a sole representation against Sardar’s name? Irony even, there 
is nothing named after Lalbahadur Shastri. Even the country’s 
infrastructure lets the Chinese Gandhis to lead the real
nationalists by a margin of 95:5 at least. If you are from Nicaragua and
 land at the Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi and take a 
taxi to the city center, you will wonder if the entire nation is built 
by a single family. You will feel without the
Gandhis India would have been a Stone Age country till now. Forget about
 the foreigners. Take an average fifth grader and ask him about Sardar, 
Shastri and these Chinese Gandhis and I am sure for the former two most 
of the kids would give that constipated
look of helplessness. Even the eighth graders now have a chapter on 
Rahul Gandhi in their social study book while only a single para talks 
about Sardar Patel in the ‘India’s Freedom Struggle’ chapter while just 
two lines grace Lalbahadur Shastri in the ‘Priministers
of India’ chapter.   
In the context of the blog, though I want, I still 
would not pit the achievements and contribution of Sardar towards the 
nation against those of Indira Gandhi. That would be a grave insult to 
the great man if pitted against a lady who all
her life only destroyed India step by step. She is just not worth it.
By the way when Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi will be awarded with Bharat Ratna? Or they are planning to honor the 
Damad-E-Hind Robert Vadra with this coveted award first before moving to
 the mother-son duo? Just curious.

Nice article! But you should also have added a para highlighting Patelji's achievements just for info.
ReplyDeleteHonestly I thought but refrained because I felt I am too small a person to even try outline the magnanimity and contributions of a great soul like Sardar. I may not have done justice to the proud legacy of Sardar. Hence restricted myself.
ReplyDeleteNice article though I feel it would have been better had you
ReplyDeletefocused more on Sardar patel rather than criticising IG. I think that it’s
redundant to mention IG failures (or for that matter, INC). It’s there for all of
India to see. It would be better to tell
about Sardar patel less known achievements such as his relentless work during
freedom struggle, his remarkable administrative skills, his steadfast support
to continuity of IAS ( formerly ICS, interestingly the entire IAS community
showed their utmost respect while attending his funeral, a feat not repeated for
any leader in independent Indian history ), protecting a train carrying Muslim
refugees to Pakistan from rioters during partition, his strict opposition to
appeasement of any community, his realistic attitude towards capitalism ( Sardar
patel was an ardent supporter of capitalism and opposed to Nehru socialist
ideas. this might have been one of the reason why Gandhi preferred Nehru over
patel. remember, Gandhi too supported socialism as it was on rise during that
time). His unwavering support to Nehru just after independence, despite all
differences, deserves respect. After independence, majority of congressmen
supported patel for the prime minister ship. Respecting Gandhi views, he
decided to step aside as any contest for this post would throw newly
independent India to political mess which patel wanted to avoid at all costs.
The
point is, Sardar patel was a national leader, in true sense. He was outstanding
in his love for the country. It wouldn’t be correct to compare him to any other
leader. Like I mentioned above, things would have been very different if he
wished personal glory. Sardar patel deserves to be loved, remembered, and
revered. He truly was the architect of independent India.
I strongly feel you are correct in criticizing IG for the reason, we need a clean slate to re-write history. People should know what damage this Nehru-Gandhi clan has done to our nation which needs to be erased first from public memory. A nice article!
ReplyDeleteBharat Ratna has lost its sheen, because of the "totally undeserving" award of this title to 3 of the most cunning traitors of Indian politics - Nehru, Indira and Rajiv
ReplyDeleteThis is a ggreat post thanks
ReplyDelete