Governing The Governors
There are many posts in our democracy which are clichéd and redundant. And to add to that, they largely remain a public money
wasting extravaganza. One such constitutional post of some deplorable pedigree is
the post of the Governor. Every
state does have one such Governor, adding no
value whatsoever but enjoying the best of the things on tax payer’s money. The
usefulness of these Governors was
kept at a level of Rajiv Shukla, by design. For a simple fact, these Governors
were never premeditated to add
anything to the democratic discourse at all. For a large part of our independent
history, this post always stood as the epitome of a graceful pre-retirement bonanza. Aged out loyal
party men were awarded with one of
such plump posts before they bid adieu to their public life. They were expected
to be non-partisan and remain above the
board in their conduct. That is why for a better part of our 60 odd year’s independent
history, such posts were never politicized
or made an object of vendetta politics. But that trend seems to be changing, well in last 12
years of Indian democracy at least.
The latest politicization of the post of Governorship has
come from BJP. The way and manner in
which BJP is hell bent on sacking at least 7 of the Congress appointed Governors, looks little childish to me. I am sure
Modi government has far bigger and important challenges in hands than
running around sacking half a dozen absolute useless entities. Looking at the current
state of our economy or for that
matter anything, NDA has it’s plate full to fix many things after a prolonged misrule of 10 years than bothering
about these Governors and their conduct at an individual level. There by asking
7 of these Congress appointed Governors to put down their papers, BJP seems to
have set a very bad precedence and
some unnecessary politicization of a pure worthless post. That said can we
really blame BJP alone for this
dirty game of vendetta politics and setting up of bad precedence? Let’s dig a bit
then.
For a bad culture or practice, it is both the person who started it and the person who
subsequently carried it forward must
be blamed in equal tone. And when it comes to setting up bad antecedence in our
political discourse, no one can beat the Congress party; not even in their
dreams. It is no accident with
Congress that they yet again destroyed the sanity
of a constitutional body through their dirty approach. To correlate to what BJP
is trying to achieve now, one need not have to go too far beyond 2004 when
Congress sacked 4 of BJP appointed Governors,
the moment they came back to power. It is a different matter that the Supreme Court
came heavily on that decision in
2010 but by then the damage has already been done. By the time our Apex court
tried to inculcate civility among
our political parties vis-à-vis the post of Governorship, the poison of feud has already set in. So
it has now snowballed in to some kind
of an irreparable state where even guidelines
seems to be failing miserably to
contain the epidemic. Some drastic measures like abolishing the post of Governor altogether, may put the lid on the
warm box but if that should be done or not is a matter of separate debate and
outside the ambit of this blog post. So let’s move forward.
Now one wonders, how on earth a pre-retirement post can
become a subject of sabotage at the
hands of the ruling governments and
most importantly why? To find the answer, one need only revisit the conduct of Congress party in recent
past. Usually the Governor used to be a political person at the fag end of his/her political career. He/She
has got no one to appease or has got
any ambition left in his/her
political life. So as a resultant, he/she is expected to showcase dignity and
non-partisan approach when in such a high democratic office. But such expected conducts of the
inhabitant bound to change when you make appear the post as a bouncing pad
of your political career. And that
is precisely what the Congress party did with SM Krishna. They not only made him a high rank cabinet minister after picking him straight from the Rajbhawan but also told the rest thereby
that they can also revitalize their
political careers if they remain loyal
to the Congress party and the first
family. That was such a massive destruction
of the laid out principles that we
saw a sea of Governors engaging themselves in acts of deplorable conduct after that. All non-Congress ruled states saw
the Governors working overtime and
out of turn to see the malfunctioning
of the state machinery. Notable among them were a certain HR Bhardwaj in Karnataka and Kamla
Beniwal in Gujarat. More than caring for a smooth running the state, these
two at least tried to make it reverse. And why they felt like doing it? Because
they always kept SM Krishna as their role
model. Now who should be blamed
here? Not certainly the Bhardwajs or the Beniwals of the world but the one who
set such a bad practice to begin
with.
And if you look at the list of names that BJP wants to be thrown out of respective Rajbhawans,
there you would find a striking similarity.
All of them are Gandhi family loyalists
and front runners in creating troubles
for BJP in their respective states. Except Shiela
Dixit (she is in a different category and we will get to her a little later)
rest all of them were violently engaged in shaping
up their dead political careers through mischief.
Governor of Maharashtra, K
Sankaranarayanan though doesn’t fall in this category he is another classic
feudal case nonetheless. In him BJP sees a conflict
of interest in the upcoming state legislative elections. Many believe, he
being the Governor doesn’t want just a stable
government in the state but a precise Congress-NCP
government only. Such are his strong inclinations
though his post warrants him to be exactly opposite
of that.
Coming back to Shiela Dixit, the lady must be impeached, for a different reason
altogether. Her involvements in scams
like CWG are anything but
transparent. That is perhaps the reason she was packed to Kerala after Delhi elections routing in a hurry. Change of guards brought about an imminent possibility of the lady being booked for her 15 years notorious deeds. And being an ardent Gandhi
family loyalist, she has to be protected from the jaws of law. Hence
the safest and easiest way out was to make her a Governor in one of the states. As
per the constitution she now can’t be charge
sheeted or investigated as long
as she is there in that wretched post. Knowing her fate, once she leaves her post, she perhaps why is the most aggressive one among the lot to
disagree on what the home secretary and BJP wants. I am not sure about others
but if this particular lady doesn’t
goes out by her own, BJP must exert pressure
on the President to impeach her unceremoniously.
Her crimes are too magnanimous to be
kept hidden under the Burqa of Governorship.
She has to face the law and she has
to be answerable to the public for
her misdeeds. And if required be duly punished for her misdeeds.
Cut down on bold words please, they are quite annoying and distracting from your message.
ReplyDeleteOhh... Just thought it may help emphasize better. But seems its working adversely. Would wait for more feedbacks on this before taking the corrective measures. Thanks a lot for letting me know.
ReplyDeleteIf those governors are gandhi family loyalists , I have no complaint about sacking them.
ReplyDeleteO please!!! I am surprised what annoys you so much and makes you think that these adjectives distract from the main theme. If anyone would feel disturbed its the dumb congress loyalists. I don't see any adjective being misplaced and out of sync with the main point. Are you another sanjay jha?
ReplyDeleteDear BC please carry on the usual way.
Deepa, If you think I am a dumb congi loyalist just because I suggested too many bold words are distracting from BC's main message, then I think you have become utterly unhinged from reality. BJP won, majority voted for them, me too. Wake up, look forward and stay classy.
ReplyDeleteBC: One or two bold words per paragraph to emphasize something work great, but anything more than that makes one look like Arnab Goswami on steroids. Love reading your posts for their content (thanks!), so take it or leave it :)
Hi BC,
ReplyDeleteJust a thought of my experience. Please keep the font consistent as it distracts the reader and is not a pleasant experience on the eyes.
I do not agree with your finding - "The latest politicization of the post of Governorship has come from BJP"
ReplyDelete---
BJP's genuine concern for removing the UPA appointed Governors can not be termed political.
---
Sheila Dixit, M.K. Narayanan, Sankaranarayanan, Bharadwaj, Kamala Beniwal are nothing but the sharp shooters of the MANMOHA-SONIA-D-GANG.
---
To allow them to continue will be gross injustice to the electorate who have thrown out the D-Gang party
---
Each one of them is involved or has abetted the nefarious activities of UPA-D-Gang.
Yaa too many bold words.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all.. why do we need such a role "Governor" ... this more like a British time role and now it needs to be removed ... likewise.. there are so many other things in the constitution that needs major amendments starting from Reservation to all kinds of freebies that are being distributed to 80% of the people and giving load on the 5% tax paying people...
ReplyDeleteThese are a few of the reasons why all educated and talented youth want to leave country... anyways.. aur bhi gam hain zamane mein.....
Also, can you please avoid using these Bold words .. kind of distraction while reading..
I am a regular visitor here... not seen such bold any where else....
Regards,
Neelesh Mansharamani