- The criminals have all the human rights of the world obtainable at their disposal which even doubles up if they happen to be from the secular minority category. While police does have nothing
- Police have no rights to shoot the criminals, even if they fire at them indiscriminately
- There are thousands of NGOs to cry for the departed criminals while none there for the police
- All those who take side of the police in any of such encounters are equally notorious as the police force itself
Monday, July 15, 2013
From Encounters To The Puppies
When it comes to some Hindu or better be, Modi bashing, can you really leave the biggest of the modern day flag bearer of secularism, Barkha Dutt too far behind? To do justice to her enviable secular image, Barkha yet again arranged a show in her flagship lie vending platform called ‘We The People’. A spectacle to debate and deliberate how ill-fated and holy cows all those alleged criminals were. How unfortunate of the holy cows to get slaughtered by our vicious police force without any crime. To help her retail the lies, she as usual has her set of Congress mouthpieces. From lawyers to the spokespersons of Congress, all were there to pass that false sense of judgment in moronizing our police force. And how apt it was to have a subject line – ‘Encounter-ing The Truth’ is anybody’s guess.
As a layman and with nothing to do with encounters from either side, it was kind of enlightenment for me. The grey heads made below few points unequivocally clear, which in one sentence could be put this way: “Come what may, our police force is nothing but bunch of jokers”. Feel so pity for AA Khan and the other encounter specialist cop present in the debate. For those unfortunate ones, who missed it, here is the gist of Barkha's show.
But there is a backdrop to this show of Barkha. Long before the episode was telecasted, the secular queen was all over the place with her apprehensions, which she always has, the moment someone articulates the word Muslim. Look how she finds it funny to see none emphasizing the life imprisonment awarded to 13 cops in a 2006 fake encounter. Really? Only if she answers, who are the chaps who highlight anything in India then it would set the tone on how such news is missed from getting its due limelight. When people like her are busy all this while with NaMo’s Puppy comment and that too the one which was blown out of context, so much so that they even easily forget to cover the death and calamity of the Kedarnath reverberation; one only finds it sidesplitting to see her aspersion on issues not getting their due. Ditto is the case with the lie of 15000 that TOI so expediently peddled for the morons in media like her to jump in to market it further; sidelining more pertinent issues. That is how sold out jurnos of our time do a self-assassination by their xenophobic overture of playing the moral card. Had she or any of her brethren been so worried for that particular news, I wonder who was stopping her from airing that when she was all busy skirting the Puppy issue or the 15000 nonsense that her masters were asking her to highlight?
Keeping aside the encounters and the legitimacy or the lack of it for the moment; I guess for our media and its bimbos nothing takes precedence over any small bit of soundbites surrounding Modi. These are the same set of morons rush towards the likes of Digvijay Singh and Manish Tewri for their compost when they see a leeway to snowball any of NaMo’s exclamations but turnaround when they are finished with their antagonism and play the moral card.
From encounter to Puppy, the media seem to have wheeled a full circle in its attempt at maligning NaMo. That’s what the precise job of lie peddlers. No? Another Bimbo who passes of as a journalist by mistake has to have her say when it comes to Modi. She, the one who advocates for a waterless Holi in order to show respect to the Maharashtra draught affected people’s plight but keeps enjoying her bit of swimming in the pool, can’t be left too far behind in the Modi hating business either. Her whole persona or the lack of it is based on the existence of Modi alone. She finds the imaginary Puppy and its crushing as a gruesome statement against the entire Muslim populace of India. Wow, how is that for a generalization? Am I really hearing such religious and secular disquiets from someone who so openly welcomed the arrangement of a beef fest in Osmania University, not so long back? All for the bloody secularism, no? Or hang-on; is that perhaps what secularism is? At least with our definition. Modi has to beg an apology for the crime he hasn’t committed while bimbos having botched sense of ideology can go ahead insulting Hindus by their rotten amplification of beef Biryani. Idea to form a separate body to monitor only the terror cases involving apprehended Muslims goes down well with such clandestine characters from our media but an analogy of NaMo, nowhere related to Muslims becomes a talking point and an act of communal gambit.
Media is not alone in their endeavor of spreading hatred against Hindus or Modi in particular. We have poets getting into the field of hate vending off late. Cutting the mature sense of judgment in the middle, we always have these ‘too clever by half’ types like Javed Akhtar. No wonder why this entity is so dear to the likes of NDTV, when it comes to hosting a collective hate scattering program against NaMo. Javed Akhtar types are in fact the byproduct of this screwed up perception of secularism that is so prevalent in our country. No surprise why he finds a no-nonsense individual like Modi possessing the habit of putting his foot in his mouth but startlingly no mention of a certain Digvijaya Singh, who holds a master degree in this very act. He instead finds Diggy an erudite individual because he always insults Hindus for every damn reason; which is perfectly in line with our version of secularism. For Javed Akhtar, mentally retards with no values at all can very well be projected as the UPA PM candidate but for him NaMo needs to grow intellectually. Which to some extent looks logical to me since, for our so called intellectuals, if you do not hate Hindus then you should be lambasted. If this is the definition of intellectualism for an intellectual like Javed Sahib then NaMo is dumb and entails way too much upgrading.
Spin doctors are not only limited to the media bimbos. In fact the entire NDTV taskforce is busy verbalizing the new age characterization of secularism. And boy doesn’t Modi and his commentaries come handy? Look at the headline in the NDTV portal today. And Barkha Dutt feels sorry for real news missing the queue. No effort was given to intricate on the points Modi derided this rubbish UPA government. No analysis is done if what Modi pointed out are real flaws in our governance or not. These are the kind of news which one anticipates from a sincere news agency. But these NDTV types are not in the profession of news distribution, I guess. They are there to banquet dishonesties to help their paymasters in the government, by any means. ‘Burqa ’ has to be within quotes and has to be at the top of their headline; not the mismanagement of the nation in the hands of these UPA morons. Because pseudo secularism is supreme. Even above nation’s growth or systematic screwing up. Burqa fits the bill of NDTV to peddle some more communal hate for NaMo. Burqa is an impeccable Muslim word and that too concerning women, which can easily be brood to give it an unspoiled communal color. This is exactly why Ishrat Jehan’s encounter is all that our media associates with whole of India while other 297 police encounters in the same period are easily unheeded.