The Overactive Liberals Of India

Our liberals have a very peculiar problem. All their life they just remain busy in shifting the goalpost as per their need. Eventually when the dawn arrives they always look fool and end up eating crow. They always do. These liberals who came to prominence post 2002 Gujarat riots are rapidly turning out to be the biggest irritant in public discourse. For every damn thing, this clueless lot seems to have an opinion or two. Surprising even, our media for which these liberals are darlings, propagate the stupid nonsense further till the point it become intolerable. Don’t believe me? Then let’s just look at two things that are making a lot of noise in last week or so. One is the Beef ban that Maharashtra government imposed and the second is some stupid documentary made by an equally stupid journalist from UK on the horrendous December 16^th Delhi gang rape that suddenly has become the new holy grill for ethical learning for our liberals. Let’s go one by one.

The Beef Ban :

Let’s take an unscientific estimate of the % of people in India who eat beef or would ever have eaten beef. I bet, even an optimistic estimate won’t put it beyond 10%, including the Advashis and the tribes of Northeast. I for sure know many Muslims who simply hate beef. Ditto with many of my Christian acquaintances. Now how that sounds when the liberals headed by a political outfit called Congress, term the ban as anti-minority? These guys get so blind by their own conviction that it is them who end up stereotyping many things, including a particular food habit with some religion. But when situation looks conducive, these same jokers would jump out of their seats and start accusing everyone else of stereotyping the Muslims. Any logic? Well, logic and liberals are as far from each other as farming and Robert Vadra are but then, with all his flaws, Robert Vadra at least doesn’t lecture us on farming ever.

Every liberal I encountered was of the view that, because of the presence of a BJP government in Maharashtra, such an anti-minority step was possible. They are correct but partly. The beef ban for sure was possible because of a BJP government and no two ways about that. But is it anti minority, I asked one liberal on my timeline. He was quick to say yes and runaway before I asked him – if also our constitution prohibits one from consuming beef, will he still consider that to be anti-minority? On the expected lines like many liberals, this particular one was also found out to be grossly ignorant of the nation he is living in. My request to furnish required links for his cocooned brain to open fell in deaf years, in line with all liberals. There you go – he neither has the required knowledge nor does he want to upgrade himself. Can anyone help these stupid jokers in such scenarios? Little they forget that the bill was signed by none other than the president of this republic and the president always executes his responsibilities on the dotted lines of our constitution, provided we are not talking about the national shame called Partibha Patil.

But ignorance is just part of my worry. The bigger worry is the hurriedness of ours in making intellectuals out of clueless individuals like Richa Chaddha or that Twinkle Khanna. But these new born intellectuals are actually great friends of our liberals. And they have reasons to befriend each other. And the common thread that strengthens their mutual love is hypocrisy. This is the same Richa Chaddha who goes about half naked in educating us how Fishes are our friends while on the other hand she advocates cows as legitimate food item. How that whole thing fits in? How one can be right in both scenarios? If at all such acts require anyone to introspect then more than Ms. Chaddha, it should be the donors who donate to PETA. I would request all of them to ask for their donations to be returned if PETA accommodates such foolhardy idiots as their ambassador. Either PETA is fooling people or these selfsame jobless celebrities who go half naked for money, without knowing what they are propagating. In both cases our legitimate money that is been donated must be returned to us with interest. I don’t see why even we shouldn’t file cheating cases against PETA, if our money is not returned.

The second category of idiots that I came across is the ones who were more than happy to do a comparison. For them, if beef is banned then so should be pork. Though the whole beef banning is not at all related to religion, it would only be good if I can answer this childish lot right now. Beef eating is considered a sin in Hindu religion because Hindus worship cow. Mark the work WORSHIP in capital. Wherein, Muslims not eating pork has got a different reason. Do the Muslims worship pig? Prophet advising Muslims to refrain from eating pork is because of the hygiene qualities that we don’t associate pigs with. They eat pretty much everything. And I am sure; during the time of Prophet, people weren’t grooming specialized pigs with sober vegetable eating habits for consumption as food. Now how this suggestion based purely on hygiene factor compares to something that a religion worships as God/Goddess? And those who advise all of us to stay away from attaching sentiments to someone’s food habit – cartoons can be attached to sentiments but not living and loving animals?

BBC Documentary:

The west has this notorious habit of picturing India in real bad color. They did it in Slumdog Millionaire and they did it again when a BBC journalist did a documentary on December 16^th Delhi gang rape and tried her best to project the entire nation as a pile of perverts with no respect for women. In both the cases there is a striking similarity. The liberals back then celebrated the insult of India with joy as if they all had won a Nobel Prize each and the liberals are barking their full throat now since the government of the day banned any such abject generalization of the nation. I asked the west patrons to do a movie on the beggars of the wall street back then and I ask the west to do a documentary on the rampant rape culture that is getting groomed right in their schools but that is a separate debate. My concern is not how others look at us. My concern is how we ourselves get so motivated to call ourselves pathetic in front of the world just because a jerk thinks so and he/she is white skinned.

First argument given against the ban is the learning that we can have from the documentary. Really? Have our 5000 year old civilization become so bankrupt with values that people who were living like apes not long back would teach us morality, ethics and value system and that too with crappy documentaries? And what kind of learning it is when someone tells you that the culture of Rape is part of your upbringing just because she found a moron who not only was accused of that crime but also a heinous variety at that? Liberals might find it fancy to see someone mocking our thousand years of culture for fun but I object to such vilification. What the documentary maker was expecting from the rapist? Was she expecting the rapists to talk the lines of Jesus during her interview? What our liberal frauds were expecting? Piousness from the scoundrel and since he never showed any trace of piety in his words or actions the entire nation ought to be of his type. Is that so? Have you ever seen any better simplification of nonsense?

Now coming back to the learning part. Our culture itself teaches us to be respectful towards women. Great epics like Mahabharata or Bhagwat Gita teach us the importance of civility towards women in our lives. Not only that, they also teach us about the repercussions if even a single woman is insulted. As far as I know, these great marvels are there for thousands of years. What our liberals were doing all this while? Didn’t they find it suitable to learn them till yet that they need the support of a half blind BBC thug to inculcate that learning? The liberals at one hand vouch for having our kids educated the values of being civilized towards the woman race but they shout wolf when someone proposes the teaching of Mahabharata and Bhagwat Gita in our schools. If someone wants our kids to learn through Hindu epics it becomes a crime towards secularism but the same frauds would go gaga when a white skinned ignorant faggot makes mockery of us. How our people can become shameless and that too so easily is just beyond me.

Now for the ban. It is banned because the BBC thought them to be above our government decisions. If they have the audacity to defy government’s dictate and go ahead with their nonsense then I don’t see why the government shouldn’t make it clear on who the boss is? For those who think the documentary is banned because we don’t want to see our own rot then let me clear this – if you can’t identify your own mess then none can make you see that either. If our liberals are blind till date and only got their doze of steroid after a BBC clown did her juggleries then I am sorry to say, the rot may well be residing within the scotch circuit and the frauds therein. By the way how about BBC making a documentary on this? Would be fun to see the dark side of UK as well. And, please stop making a satan of an entire country because of a handful of scoundrels and the liberal frauds shouldn’t cheer any such filthy extravaganza if they are left with an iota of shame, which I guess they don’t.