The Most Divisive People Of India

I always reiterate how the word ‘Secularism’ is extremely abused in India. And most of you, irrespective of your political inclination would agree with me here. While we concentrate on the word ‘Secularism’ and dissect its use or misuse to its last granule, we conveniently forget another word which is equally misused if not more. And that word ladies and gentlemen is ‘Divisive’. Yet again, I don’t see much of a disagreement here either. One of my readers mailed me yesterday citing her dissatisfaction on how I only distillate on secularism while not highlighting other equally sabotaged phenomenon. She was correct with her dissatisfaction, let me tell you. In fact she highlighted the word ‘Divisive’ to me in her mail. Hell, how could I miss this; was the first thing that came to my mind. To respect her request/anger here I am to elaborate how Divisive is equally been abused in our political scene. For that, how about listing a series of “Most Divisive” politicians of India, contrary to the list that the corrupt Congress in connivance with the paid media trying to shove down our throats? And the list to follow doesn’t have any specific order. It is just the names those popped up in my head as I write on.

Mulayam Singh Yadav – How many of you believe this chap is even worth calling a politician, let alone a leader? Won’t be many I guess. He made the politics of appeasement an art in itself. I won’t be wrong by much of a margin if I say – this lout of a human made a career for himself and his family by just dividing the society in as many fragments as he can. The number of riots that occur in UP vis-à-vis his party in power in the state explains this complex art of dividing people on the religious lines. It is barely two years since SP threw out BSP from power in the state but we already have more than 100 riots of various sizes in UP. Muzaffarnagar is just one of them. And what was the response of SP post the riot? Hell, yes; the Hindus are the culprit as always and the elected CM must wear a skull cap while addressing the media to update this universal fact. Though it is well-known, to which extent Mulayam can go in appeasing to safeguard his vested interests but ask him to take a moral high ground, the moron would behave as if his sole motto in life is to thwart away the communal and divisive forces from attaining power. How many of you remember the Durga Shakti Nagpal episiode and the subsequent miscarriage of everything by the SP government led by another fraud masquerading as a leader called Akhilesh Yadav? To appease their votebank these morons even didn’t spare an honest public servant from their dirty games. Divisive attitude was so magnanimous that their own goons scaled down an erected Muslim structure to give it a communal color. But ask Mulayam Singh to point out who the most divisive leader in India, his assessment won’t go much beyond Narendra Modi and BJP. By the way, I am not writing a separate stanza on Akhilesh Yadav because he is as good or bad as his tout father. Or maybe even more.

Lalu Yadav – The Chara man and perhaps the most corrupt person this earth has ever seen. Along with his corrupt Avatar he is another master at dividing people in caste lines and communal to the core. As true to our homegrown flavor of secularism, this moron is a champion of appeasement as well. But according to our media he is a great exponent of secularism. Perhaps because he hired an Osama Bin Laden lookalike during last Bihar assembly elections and went around touting how Osamaji is with him, not with Congress. Could you believe, a dreaded terrorist is hailed to such an extent for votebank and yet this fraud would always be seen shouting, much like Mulayam, on how his sole motto in life is to keep away the so called communal forces? Like Mulayam, this moron also made a career by dividing people on caste and religious lines for decades. But guess what – he is a darling to the Congress party, for whom NaMo and BJP are the most communal outfit but not this lout after being proud to have an Osama lookalike alongside him.

Digvijay Singh – He is a jewel and must be preserved with ought most care for future generation’s reference. He is a flag bearer of secularism and the SPOC of Congress for all religious related nonsense. All that this creature did in his life is to divide people with his unique foot-in-the-mouth abilities and lick clean some dynasty posteriors. For this rascal even the pride of our slain martyrs is an avenue to peddle his version of secularism and divide people on the go. While the nation was mourning the loss of our brave officers this moron ran around cajoling the terrorists and their families in Azamgarh and announced the Batla house encounter was fake. Such is the level of deception and divisive characteristics. Even before all the dead of 26/11 could be identified, this scoundrel has his theory to suggest how the entire 26/11 was a covert act of RSS. If that was not enough this scumbag went ahead and inaugurated a book written by a moron Mullah which suggests pretty much what he was saying. But ask him to elaborate what is communal and divisive politics, this joker would have the names of RSS, Narendra Modi and the rest of BJP readily available at the tip of his malicious tongue.

Arvind Kejriwal – He is not only opportunistic but also highly divisive and communal. Since the Mullahs find it an insult, god knows why and how to worship their motherland and the national flag, this joker conveniently removed the image of Bharat Mata from every subsequent banner of Anna movement. Even Swami Vivekananda was rapidly turning out to be an insult to the Mullahs as he wears saffron. So his image also was duly erased from the background to appease a bunch of louts who find insult in every god damn thing. And who can forget this moron’s attempt at appeasing his Muslim votes when he ran around like a headless chicken, in the footsteps of his Guru Digvijay Singh and announced the encounter of Batla house as fake. Before the votes, this opportunistic clown was seen visiting all the Maulabis of Delhi and pledging his support for their cause (read appeasement) but was seen nowhere near a temple. And now that he is going to be the CM of Delhi, which area he promised to start implementing his 700 liter free water gas bag? Ohh, yes; the Muslim ghettos of the NCR region. Though one should never have a problem from where he want to start as long as the promises are kept but then why one would announce it if the idea was not to throw his first official appeasement dole?

Sonia Gandhi – The queen bee among a congregation of thieves. But I don’t blame her entirely since she is driven by the core ideology of the party which she heads. Like her party, which survived on the principle of dividing people since independence, she happens to be a fair game with such rotten ideology. Her latest spectacle in dividing people on caste lines came right after the Muzaffarnagar riots. While visiting the riot rehabilitation centers, she for some reason which is no more a secret, visited only the Muslim barracks. She not only visited there with a worthless human whom we refer as our PM but also was seen addressing the media with a tone that suggest how only the Muslims were at the receiving end of some Hindu atrocities. The worthless scumbag alongside her just blinked with his share of annoyance while she was at it. The duo never cared to visit the Hindu centers or  hear their side of the story because that is not secularism. How on earth you even give a patient hearing to the Hindu cause and yet be termed as secular? But ask this lady to deliver some profane, she has all adjectives like ‘Maut Ka Saudagar’ to showcase. But as I said at the beginning, I am not blaming her entirely. She is just being true to the rotten ideology of her equally rotten political outfit.

Raj Thakrey – He is a scumbag, no two ways about it. Though he has some point at times, but it is no way to divide people with respect to the states they belong to put your points through. This chap is a divisive character of his own type. For him anything that is not Marathi is an object to be kicked out. Doesn’t matter even if the object in discussion is a non-Marathi dog. Since the days he parted ways from Siv-Sena and formed his own lout of an outfit, all that he is doing is dividing people on the line of Marathi and non-Marathi. To accomplish such nefarious agenda he has this simple approach – just beat the shit out of any non-Marathi entity you come across. Doesn’t matter if he/she is a poor taxi driver or Pani-Puri vendor. But ask him or his clowns to come to the rescue of Mumbai during the times like 26/11, he will simply hide himself in a hole. I feel ashamed and astonished to see the number of votes he gets on such abject divisive lines. Are people of Maharashtra such idiots to take side of such divisive characters? But that said -  this chap is not as dangerous as the morons listed above.

Narendra Modi – Modi fans, which also includes me, take this bitter pill. He is divisive and there are no two ways about it. Like Raj Thakrey he may be 1/1000 dangerous as other scumbags but nevertheless, he is divisive. It is no denying that his plank of governance and development is winning him seats tenure after tenure but can’t rule out the advantage of his divisive abilities to his success. It may be little but it is there. It is no rocket science to realize, he has perpetually molded the Hindu votes of Gujarat on his favor by his divisive qualities. As much as he may have lost because of Gujarat riots, he seems to have negated the loss by double the amount of gain. Thanks to the riot he emerged as the Hindu centric leader and he loves to carry that notion without putting any effort to shake it off. His image of a strong and unforgiving leader has even forced the Muslims to realize the ground realities to see where their interest lies; even if that means supporting Modi. But that said, there is a catch with Modi’s divisive qualities. While other scumbags are divisive with an agenda to hurt the nation, NaMo is divisive for the betterment and development. Better than the listed morons but nonetheless divisive.

Me – I am not sure if I fit this list or not. But anyway, I love a little bit of self-assessment. Being from the RSS school of thoughts, I am biased. Biased for the core ethos of Hindus, Hindutwa and Hindu ideology. I will always put my money on whoever assures me of respecting and keeping intact these three aspects of Hindusim in the long run. At the current state, I only see BJP safeguarding my inherent interest to some extent, if not fully. And I don’t care if I end up dividing people to safeguard the core identities of my religion. At least I am not training idiots with Kalashnikovs and bombs for that. All that I want from my divisive tactics is to bring some rational into our society and thought process. My idea is simply to handover a far better and more refined India to our kids tomorrow and if I have to divide people a bit in this endeavor, I find the bargain quite affordable. I want truth to prevail and I see dividing people a little to achieve this as no crime. I want people who are put on the seat of power to realize the pain of those who are on the ground and for that if I have to divide people a bit, I will do it on any given day. I am not ashamed of it at all since my divisive tactics is not to divide the nation but to bring a more coherence among us.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, herewith I conclude the list. Few ornamenting names like Mayawati are missed but there is always a part-II. So watch out.