Why Shouldn’t Sardar Patel Be Put Above Indira Gandhi?
You see the coefficient of the linear, is
juxtaposition, by the hemoglobin of the atmospheric pressure in the
country…
- Amitab Bachan (Amar, Akbar, Anthony)
No, I am not turning into a Bollywood movie
critic. Looking at the recent confused mindset of the Congress leaders
after prolonged losses in various elections the entire leadership might
as well have uttered the above line on the issue
of how the present government gave a royal snub to Indira Gandhi on her
death anniversary and still would have made as much sense as their
entire jamboree out of frustration did.
True to their quality of remaining perpetual
sycophants for the Nehru-Gandhi clan, the Congress leadership fell over
each other in criticizing BJP on their decision to sidekick Indira
Gandhi from the scheme of things and gone ahead to celebrate
October 31st as the birth anniversary of Sardar Ballabh Bhai
Patel as ‘National Unity Day’ henceforth. Now two question needs to be
answered right here. First – Is Sardar not a legitimate candidate for
his birthday to be celebrated in grand scale
manner? Second – Has Indira Gandhi done anything credible for the nation
that we should even celebrate her death anniversary as if there is no
tomorrow? And this post in particular will revolve around these two
questions to figure out if Modi government is
fair in their decision to the tune that the NDA office bearers think it
to be.
First let’s move to Indira Gandhi and her
contributions or the lack of it towards the nation. Why IG to start
with? Because till date the government of India, irrespective of which
party is in power used to celebrate October 31st
as the death anniversary of Indira Gandhi. It won’t be an exaggeration
if I say most of this Facebook and MTV Roadies generation may not even
be aware that Sardar Patel was born on the same day. So IG and her
importance over the iron man must have solid reasons
to justify why the preceding governments so conveniently forgot the
first home minister of India.
So there we go. Whenever someone reminds me of IG
the first and the last thing that crosses my mind is the emergency and a
rogue called Sanjay Gandhi, who unfortunately was the son of this lady.
Now show me one single country where the
birth and death anniversary of a leader who probably could be
instrumental (better be, primary reason) for the enormous number of poor
and illiterate in the country gets his/her birthday celebrated like a
mega national event. There would be countries where
dictators celebrate their rogue ancestors but we are a democracy and
that too largest among the world. Even the reason behind imposing
emergency is more criminal than the emergency itself. The lady did it
not because the circumstances demanded for it but because
her own ego was getting sabotaged for genuine reasons. The Allahabad
high court rightly revoked her Loksabha win because she was found to
have misused state machinery for electoral gain. Seeing her power going
out of her hands she promptly announced emergency
there by curbing the powers of the state, its judiciary and everything
in between. Many nationalistic leaders were arrested and put behind bars
because they were agitating against such naked massacre of our
democratic frameworks. Not only that, the lady let
loose his retard son on the entire populace to run mayhem. Sanjay Gandhi
along with his stooges literally looted the nation in broad daylight.
Unaccounted loans of large sums were disbursed to the near and dear ones
of SG without zero or minimal paperwork.
A rough estimate of the loots in disguise of bank loans from all state
run banks stands at a staggering 783 crores. 783 crores during seventies
and you can easily calculate the amount in contemporary times. Not only
loot but all democratic institutions were
manhandled and turned to ashes in just about 18 months. Not a single
institution was left from the dirty doings of the mother-son duo. Lest
we forget the number of innocents, those were murdered so that the loot
can go on unopposed. It would be optimism if
I say the country was dragged at least 20 years back because of this
emergency.
This is not only one instance where the lady messed
up the nation for her own ego and personal gain. Bhindranwale is
another dark spot in Indian history, as was the emergency. Her father
made a mess with Kashmir and standing true to the
legacy of her father she messed up Punjab. I don’t know if it is
hereditary but messing up in matters that are nationalistic seems to be
running in the grand family of Congress. Thankfully the Punjab clutter
got cleared up in about a decade and half else we
are pretty much cleaning up the rot that Nehru piled in Kashmir since
last six decades and still we are far from cleaning it all. Just because
the Bhindranwale was hurting the one-upmanship of IG, the lady did
something that looked strategically so out of
tune. But till date I wonder – had that been a mosque instead of golden
temple and the terrorists hidden inside were Muslims instead of Sikhs,
would have IG dared to order our army to rush in? Well my guess is as
good as yours. From this point it would be
utterly unfair on my part if I don’t revisit the times when the Muslim
appeasement started to become a state policy. Though Nehru installed the
foundation stones for appeasement he was more of a socialist centric
than otherwise. In true sense it is Indira
who commissioned this rotten culture of appeasement into our political
discourse.
Can such a lady be even compared with the
magnanimity of a legend like Sardar, let alone putting her above? Even
the Bharat Ratna she won has a dark secret hidden behind it. As per our
cultural ministry’s own words, a Bharat Ratna for an
individual can only be suggested by the priminister of the nation. And
when Indira won it in 1971, it was she who was the PM herself. Does this
mean she awarded Bharat Ratna to herself only? Won’t be surprised if
that was the case since she only seem to be
following her great clueless father’s legacy. Ditto like her father, who
awarded Bharat Ratna to himself while still being the PM of the nation
in 1955 Indira repeated the shamelessness quite nonchalantly. But come
to Sardar Patel, the Congress party had to
wait 41 years post Sardar’s death to realize how big a character the man
was. And, this is not all. When eventually Sardar was found to be
competent enough for the award of Bharat Ratna, it was not a Chinese
Gandhi that was at the helm but Narasimha Rao. If
you think that is all then wait. Sardar was awarded the honor along with
Rajiv Gandhi who so called achieved martyrdom (according to Congress
dictionary) just couple of years back.
I would be fair with my assessment if I say;
Congress party by design ignored a persona like Sardar Patel so that the
image of all the Chinese Gandhis of the family is not over shadowed by
true nationalists. Ditto is the case with Lalbahadur
Shatri and to some extent even Narasimha Rao. And that is precisely what
Narendra Modi is trying to point out. When Congress accuses Modi of
hijacking the idea of Sardar Patel it only calls for laugh riots. Before
we move ahead, I want to ask every sycophant
in Congress – when Congress ever cared for anyone else except the
Gandhi-Nehru family? It was and is the Gandhi family all the way. The
jokers were so oblivious to their real greats that there arises no
question of anyone hijacking any great personality from
them. It is only when Modi took out Sardar from that designed oblivion
and brought him into public memory and bestowed the due respect that
Sardar demands, the Congress reptiles woke from their planned slumber
and started shouting. Where were the same faggots
when they conveniently named 51 state run schemes after Gandhi family
against a sole representation against Sardar’s name? Irony even, there
is nothing named after Lalbahadur Shastri. Even the country’s
infrastructure lets the Chinese Gandhis to lead the real
nationalists by a margin of 95:5 at least. If you are from Nicaragua and
land at the Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi and take a
taxi to the city center, you will wonder if the entire nation is built
by a single family. You will feel without the
Gandhis India would have been a Stone Age country till now. Forget about
the foreigners. Take an average fifth grader and ask him about Sardar,
Shastri and these Chinese Gandhis and I am sure for the former two most
of the kids would give that constipated
look of helplessness. Even the eighth graders now have a chapter on
Rahul Gandhi in their social study book while only a single para talks
about Sardar Patel in the ‘India’s Freedom Struggle’ chapter while just
two lines grace Lalbahadur Shastri in the ‘Priministers
of India’ chapter.
In the context of the blog, though I want, I still
would not pit the achievements and contribution of Sardar towards the
nation against those of Indira Gandhi. That would be a grave insult to
the great man if pitted against a lady who all
her life only destroyed India step by step. She is just not worth it.
By the way when Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi will be awarded with Bharat Ratna? Or they are planning to honor the
Damad-E-Hind Robert Vadra with this coveted award first before moving to
the mother-son duo? Just curious.
Nice article! But you should also have added a para highlighting Patelji's achievements just for info.
ReplyDeleteHonestly I thought but refrained because I felt I am too small a person to even try outline the magnanimity and contributions of a great soul like Sardar. I may not have done justice to the proud legacy of Sardar. Hence restricted myself.
ReplyDeleteNice article though I feel it would have been better had you
ReplyDeletefocused more on Sardar patel rather than criticising IG. I think that it’s
redundant to mention IG failures (or for that matter, INC). It’s there for all of
India to see. It would be better to tell
about Sardar patel less known achievements such as his relentless work during
freedom struggle, his remarkable administrative skills, his steadfast support
to continuity of IAS ( formerly ICS, interestingly the entire IAS community
showed their utmost respect while attending his funeral, a feat not repeated for
any leader in independent Indian history ), protecting a train carrying Muslim
refugees to Pakistan from rioters during partition, his strict opposition to
appeasement of any community, his realistic attitude towards capitalism ( Sardar
patel was an ardent supporter of capitalism and opposed to Nehru socialist
ideas. this might have been one of the reason why Gandhi preferred Nehru over
patel. remember, Gandhi too supported socialism as it was on rise during that
time). His unwavering support to Nehru just after independence, despite all
differences, deserves respect. After independence, majority of congressmen
supported patel for the prime minister ship. Respecting Gandhi views, he
decided to step aside as any contest for this post would throw newly
independent India to political mess which patel wanted to avoid at all costs.
The
point is, Sardar patel was a national leader, in true sense. He was outstanding
in his love for the country. It wouldn’t be correct to compare him to any other
leader. Like I mentioned above, things would have been very different if he
wished personal glory. Sardar patel deserves to be loved, remembered, and
revered. He truly was the architect of independent India.
I strongly feel you are correct in criticizing IG for the reason, we need a clean slate to re-write history. People should know what damage this Nehru-Gandhi clan has done to our nation which needs to be erased first from public memory. A nice article!
ReplyDeleteBharat Ratna has lost its sheen, because of the "totally undeserving" award of this title to 3 of the most cunning traitors of Indian politics - Nehru, Indira and Rajiv
ReplyDeleteThis is a ggreat post thanks
ReplyDelete